Hi Pankaj, can you see tables in the ruleset without using the search, and filter criteria?  I'm just asking to see if your connection is actually valid. What connector / DBMS are you using?  Out-of-the-box connector or extended connector / bring your ...

Hi Vinoth, were you unable to refresh because the engine passed the critical threshold where all VDB operations were halted?  Have you talked to the Delphix Admin about cleaning up some bookmarks possibly holding snapshots, snapshots not needed or replicating ...

Hi  Pankaj, Long time no talk!  Please reach out to your CS representative and arrange for a demo of our relatively new Hyperscale product, which is specifically designed to handle very large workloads.  Best, David ------------------------------ David ...

Hi Chris, I found this as well - we have this KBA with some resources that might prove useful: https://support.delphix.com/Support_Policies_and_Technical_Bulletins/Support_Policies/How_To_Obtain_Support_for_DxToolkit_(KBA1842) As for the specific Powershell ...

Thank you, Paul. I'm hoping there is an existing example out there somewhere as I am not a proficient programmer. We have an Operations Team that would ultimately be calling the script, and again, it would be a call initiated from a Windows Server to ...

MC_NAMES still needs the external algorithm for value replacements, but it allows to use instead of secure lookup any other String compatible algorithm. NAME framework always uses SecureLookup for value replacement which causes collissions (two inputs ...

Hi Tino, Yes I am using non-unique algorithm (name Secure lookup) for unique (PK/FK) constraint column and it produces duplicate values. Seems MC_names, referred above is something which can be a new on-demand (billable) plugin & could be used as regular ...

Your issue is simply that you try to use a NON-UNIQUE llogic on a UNIQUE key. The names framework is not designed to be unique as names tend to be NEVER unique. The is a customisation called MC_NAMES that has the almost identical logic as NAMES but it ...